Is the opener's compassion-versus-fiscal fight a missing calculation under a shared objective, or a large leftover about which objective to declare?

Once prosperity, safety, and stability are declared, is a level determined, or is declaring them still the fight?

What would count as a large leftover once prosperity, safety, and stability are shared, without recoding it as unfinished computation?

Do Caplan, Huemer, and Fishkin measure the leftover after named computation, or three other objects?

Does the voter-economist gap measure the leftover that survives among people who already have models?

Does partisan clustering measure empirical-belief capture, or party bundling of value packages?

Does briefing-induced convergence show a computed mechanism, or agreement on whoever wrote the briefing?

Are OGAS and Cybersyn the same object as "compute the mechanism, drop dominated options," or the planner §VI disavows?

Is the immune-system story about a planner lineage, or about computing policy as such?

Is the live problem missing models, or models that already exist and do not move votes?

Which diagnosis is the Authority for: missing models, or ignored models?