The voluntary-audit opener is a Restatement §324A doctrine claim written as a chosen strategy. The page does not exhibit a paired judgment: same injury, same information, different attribution because of the look. "Don't look" is inferred from the undertaking rule, not from a specimen where commissioning the audit moved who paid.

Drug-approval delay and nuclear-versus-coal can be produced by who gets a story without an act-tracking liability rule. "No attribution, no story" and "no single coal death attributed to a specific decision" are visibility claims; if headlines were symmetric while Hurley and §324A stayed fixed, delay and coal-continuation could still win.

The page requires any repair to define duties, evidentiary standards, safe harbors, and limits against coercion, then does not compile those slots for any diagnosed domain. "Diagnostic not warrant" leaves the repair space infinite under the page's own rule.

Persistence in §XII is an Olsonian beneficiary claim: police unions, regulatory agencies, and legal professions have concentrated interest in preserving the architecture. If those beneficiaries can refuse a change in who may act, the Unstained Incompetent are a selected workforce, not the actuator.

Dhyani already has interact-and-become-responsible; Hurley already has no duty to treat; Foot/Thomson already have act versus omission at the same body count; §324A already attaches duty to the look. The named remainder is Unstained Incompetent as population selection and Liability Singularity as directional pressure. Those are the claims the specimens do not carry.