Does publishing an implementation spec convert the reliability layer, or only the reader's disposition toward architecture?

Holding greed fixed, which of the three architectural features, if reversed, would have blocked the crisis as compiled here?

Does flourishing license only the four stability requirements, or does it also pull distribution, sacrifice, and standing into the implementation specification?

What observation would force recoding "interpreted into flexibility" as the amendment channel working, rather than as the Skeleton failing?

Who, at inference, may halt an action the model still wants, and what observation distinguishes that from a training-time constitution?

Does "architect the game board" convert the constraint that made the martyr necessary, or convert the presence of martyrs?