What institutional incentive would let a future owner absorb a visible distress incident without being selected out by legal, product, or reputation pressure?

If the historical section dropped out, would the optimizer-plus-power-plus-weights claim still be the same claim?

In one public spec, does "honest" mean don't-say-false-things or don't-cause-distress?

On one live harmlessness rule, what would count as consumed adaptive margin rather than a correctly blocked killing or maiming path?