Is the gate for unused diagnoses looking for a home, or for procedures that ship with no model?

Does "attach a model to the classification" identify the opening failure, or only the specimen's missing job?

Can the five questions be the same bottleneck for an unused diagnosis and for a procedure that never requested a model?

Can a missing job be the canonical case if the cost it would have caught is not shown?

Does "solved attachment" mean a mandatory inbox, or an answer duty if the number is set aside?

After splitting receipt from answer-duty, which one is the thesis's bottleneck?

If futarchy binds and still is not a cognition layer, is attachment the remaining work?

Does the native-language advantage of statute-graph findings transfer to unofficial consequence models?

What would show a counter-model becoming citeable rather than remaining a smarter PDF?

Can a ceremonial survivor with citations count as the prediction succeeding while the cognition layer still fails?

Is the 2031 claim only which offices live, or also whether their output binds a decision?

For one 2026 body, does 2031 survival come with a delayed or overridden decision, or only with citations?