Can a pair whose recurring fight already survived "communicate openly" change the next instance given only the diagnostic questions and the article template, without a third person who already has the stack?

Is Mask in scope for the Shared Skeleton, or a limit the essay walks up to and then offers a peer tool?

If one party will not accept any article that constrains them, does the frame recode from treaty collision to refusal to share a constitution?

Does "whose protocol, who pays" name a fact Sager's mismatch plus accommodation does not already have, or only the same win with a communication-method specimen?

What stops the Shared Skeleton from becoming the essay-reader's treaty asserted as universal, which is the failure mode the repair section already names?

Can the distressed person's side be rewritten as a behavior both can see honored or violated, or does the worked example fail the honor/violate test it is meant to illustrate?