Are the predecessor failures one mechanism, or several leftovers sharing a family name?

After 1943, is the live problem still "purpose from mechanism," or "which signal, with players as referees"?

Is "same wall" load-bearing, or can the taxonomy stand without it?

Does applying Wiener's purpose-as-feedback to a state count as crossing, or does crossing require a physics-derived reference?

Is a state-scale feedback architecture with blank identity a crossing, a partial crossing, or a non-crossing?

Is a subsystem that can destroy the loop a design constraint, or an exogenous shock that does not bind the next design?

What conclusion does the lineage evidence: mechanism-governs-politics, or the physics-derived assembly they did not reach?

Is civilizational purpose a setpoint knowable in advance, or a selection caption written after collapse?

Can a survival filter specify what to grow, or only that some gardens die?

What civilizational target would have been as knowable in 1972 as 20°C is to a thermostat?

If the method is "derive from physics," is energy-throughput the closer physical variable, and complexity a recode of the goal?

Does a visible violation-bit close the player-referee recursion, or does it still need someone who treats the bit as ending the game?

Are courts and voters the external enforcer under a new name, or is there a visibility condition that flips without them?