Can a diagnostic that returns two broken thresholds still count as locating which one to address first?

If both 2 and 3 are down, is repairing 2 first required by the sequence, or only if 3 would then fire?

If threshold 3 is independently broken, does "start at the earliest" still change the outcome?

Is the binding record a different object from the duty that would have stopped the cladding, or the same object counted at two cuts?

If only the sign-off file is repaired and duty stays costless for ignoring complaint logs, does the cladding decision still issue?

Is the required architecture a skip of the hierarchy, or a sequence through official conversions?

Are the thresholds conversions a signal must complete, or a path it must climb?

Can the locator tell a working skip from a working climb when both complete the same conversions?

Is identical output across skip and climb acceptable, or does the test need a fourth question about path?

Is a four-year court path missing response-duty infrastructure, or slow use of infrastructure the page already lists?

Is "no form compelled halt until litigation" a missing class, or a grade of duty among classes that exist?

Does "t3 failed" distinguish no duty-bearer from duty-only-at- litigation-cost?