Who, after a draft is being treated as settled policy, can force artifact-level 7-field review rather than leave it in the draft class?

Does a channel ban compile as gate ownership, or only as destruction of one under-recording route?

Can any named reviewer compel cognition that was never declared into a file to climb the chain, or only compel production of what is already possessed?

If the owner applied the 7 fields to the FWS draft opinions, which field would have forced conversion while legal finality was still absent?

For one of the 37 rights-affecting tools, did the authority possess an admissible reasoning record it declined to publish, or was no such record formed?

If the agency head authorizes Exemption 5 withholding, who can order the model or analysis into a contestable record against that authorization?

Which single chain step is the algorithmic Record Gate, and which of these instruments owns it?

Is a records officer who cannot review the deferral because of volume a legitimacy failure or a capacity failure?