Does Future Aliveness Potential decide anything before the people have been captioned as ill, generative, young, or old?

Is there a lever case where FAP and remaining life-years disagree, or is "wrong variable" a caption on QALYs?

Does the lever flip on a measurable other than the generative tag, once remaining years are matched?

Is "generative potential" an input to the Integrity step, or the verdict that step is supposed to precede?

What scoring of future-aliveness is not ranking whose future the agent already likes?

Is "solved" a claim about the lever, or only about replacing a test with a diagnostic?

Is the Fecundity/Synergy weighting a discovered constraint, or an asserted architecture?

What, other than dropping a variable, would make an Architect or Gardener weighting wrong?

In the unlabeled lever, does Aliveness return anything other than 5 > 1?

Does the Integrity step apply to forced no-delay decisions, or only to decisions that can be postponed?

Does "poorly posed" withdraw the unlabeled lever, or does the procedure have a no-delay default that pulls?