Is there a value, not a preference, that fails the five-trait class test?

Do equality, freedom, and family honor carry the class claim before variant, host, pathway, population, fitness, horizon, and differential-transmission evidence are filled?

Can "equality" as it shows up at work or at dinner fill host, copied object, fitness measure, and horizon, with evidence that copying — not something else — made it common?

If people copy hand-washing because it stops them getting sick, is that replicator success or ordinary learning?

Does "follow the evidence" sit in the symbiotic column because groups that use it keep working, or because people fuse with the slogan and punish heresy?

Is the physics row a kind of value, or a host-effect test run on replicator complexes?

Can the same slogan be a physics-constrained configuration and a replicator package, depending on which body and period you count?

Does naming physics as the constraint settle a value dispute, or only require the parties to name a host and a period?

What observable says you should keep arguing rather than treat the defense as the copying machinery?

Can the other side name a measured host-effect, over a named period, that would make them drop the package?

What would show the reward is for accuracy, not for a coalition's stand-in for accuracy?