Does sorting claims into six types reopen equality, freedom, or tradition, or only rename them as packages?

Is typing a first cut that starts an unbundle, or a verdict that settles the fight?

What would recode a piece of equality from "we promised this" to "this wrecks the named host"?

What makes a component parasitic other than failing a persistence host already picked?

Is a short-horizon host a category error, or a different named system under the page's own procedure?

Is the opening cliché a mix of claim types, or a refusal to sign the long-horizon host?

How should a refusal to name a long-horizon host be typed: who-counts, present-commitment, or immune response?

Does the fertility constraint attach to a lineage, a polity, or both only after the polity is defined as that lineage?

Can a polity fail the TFR test and still persist as the named host?

Does the lead example of "ask which type" actually ask, or does it deliver a type as a verdict?

Does the temporal-trick section carry the method, or only a pre-typed cartoon?

Does the utilitarian substitution identify the decline, or only date a vocabulary change in the same centuries?

Does dropping the Bentham paragraph shrink the load-bearing argument?