Does hiding when you are born switch the rule from maximin to expected value, or only apply maximin to the worst generation?

Once birth date is hidden, is the remaining choice still maximin versus expected value, or has impartiality already picked one?

If birth year is hidden, does the chooser ban the research, or fund it?

Which funding path is doing the necessary lowering, and does a transfer that raises Generation 10's capacity still count?

Which specimen is the physics supposed to constrain: Rawls's chooser, or a median voter with a bond market?

Is the finding the old menu, or the claim that physics then eliminates all but variance-preservation?

If process variance is intact, is the Nordic row a thermodynamic failure of floor-max, or a different failure under abundance?

If every wealthy democracy fails the fertility test, including ones with exploration capacity, does Configuration B persist?

Is the filter "inequality only if it lifts the floor," or "no credit for benefits outside the election cycle"?

Does ignorance of the threat distribution pick expected-value- plus-variance over maximin, or does it leave both live?

For which named unknown does more present failure raise survival odds more than it raises ruin odds?

Is "Rawls won" a claim about seminars, or about the construction of the transfer state?

Does the replicator claim explain why the Veil spread, or why floor-max democracy exists?