Is the table a finding, or a picture of an unmeasured hypothesis?

Do the three timing problems license scored cells for slogan-properties, or only a claim about laws that do not die?

Can a surviving housing law stand in for electoral fitness of value-packages?

Can two numbers be written down for one package people actually vote on?

Is a well-travelling, host-supporting package allowed as a table row, or ruled out by definition?

Is the ratchet a restatement of the table, or a separate one-direction prediction?

What observable counts as the ratchet turning back?

Do legislative timing problems identify value-package electoral fitness, or is that a jump?

Does a flat willingness-to-pay pick a systemic category, or only fail as a quantity?

Is the flat number evidence of tracking a system, or only of a bad question?

Can a failed scalar instrument be evidence that people track viability?

If civilizational goods do not decompose, what do the section VII machines read?

Is the lower level unable to specify the higher, or able and biased?

Which claim is doing the work: biased aggregation, or the wrong unit in principle?

Is flourishing specified independently of the commitments being voted on?

Does picking host and horizon still sit on the vote side of the operational boundary?

Is choosing who and when still a vote on values?

Does organized-complexity-over-longest-horizon sit outside the proxy problem, or is it another stand-in?

Are longest-horizon and complexity allowed to spend the current population or agency, or are they already moral commitments?

Does the debt brake show thermodynamics installing a constraint, or a one-shot vote installing one?

Is a referendum-installed constraint still a vote on values, or a different tool after install?

Does the antibody story predict the debt-brake install, or overclaim?

In one named window, what would show the criterion won because it is true, not because it travelled?