Does outsider entry after death show four-axis coupling, or two-axis field leadership plus a death shock?

Is bonding a predicted package of four prices, or a name for two prices plus optional downstream mood?

What observation would show bonding failing rather than merely two of four prices being named?

Do all four prices jump together at a living dissent event?

Can a death be recoded as two-axis without changing the outsider-entry fact?

On the strong-hold specimen, is death predicted to rupture or to certify succession?

Does "holds strongly" mean the three properties, or a funeral result?

What would force a recode of the strong-hold specimen from rupture-predicted to ceremony-predicted?

Is the identifying treatment sudden death, or any senior exit that loosens panels and labs?

Does the mechanism claim travel from premature death to aging-out, or only the slogan?

Is live decoupling replacing funeral-only lock, or accelerating an aging-out window that already exists?

Do planned retirement and premature death move the same outsider-entry outcomes?

Does selective stubbornness distinguish infrastructure from sunk-cost investment in the career-defining frame?

Is the psychology-versus-structure cut operationalized by the four-price test, or still by selectivity?

Can the four-price test fail in either direction, or only classify stubborn stars as nodes?

Does "live decoupling" split the axes, or retarget the same hiring-committee actuator?

Is career-value a test of an existing channel, or a missing actuator?

Who may close a tenure file's seriousness coding as the remaining bonded actuator?

Does the only feasible installer reproduce personal bracing?

Is post-death outsider entry a released capacity constraint or a released dissent-tax?

Can living non-entry be recoded as crowding without four-price punishment?

Does the empirical specimen carry the living dissent-tax, or only posthumous entry?